[Q7X]≫ Download Gratis Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World Jack Weatherford Books

Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World Jack Weatherford Books

Download As PDF : Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World Jack Weatherford Books

Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World Jack Weatherford Books

I was very excited for this book and the ambitiousness of its scope, but found myself underwhelmed. It's entertaining and educational, I found myself wanting more in multiple respects. More details, more evidence, more expansive coverage.

The book can't quite seem to decide what it wants to be. Is it a thesis of how the Mongol empire provided foundational technologies and practices of the modern age? Is it a biography of Genghis Khan? Is it a history of the Mongol empire? It turns out to be a haphazard mix of all three, with major shortcomings on all fronts.

As a broader anthropological thesis about the impact of Genghis Khan, Weatherford makes a very compelling case that the Mongol empire contained some then-innovative ASPECTS of modern ideals (e.g. religious tolerance, meritocracy, globalization of commerce, public schooling, paper currency, among others). He convincingly argues that the Mongols spread good ideas from one region of the empire to another, and combined those ideas in novel ways. He doesn't do a very good job of arguing that these innovations formed the basis of the modernity, spread into the broader world, and continued into today. Much of his focus is also on developments after the death of Genghis, particularly on Kubalai. While this makes sense from a historical narrative perspective, it's harder to tie the achievements of Kubalai back to Genghis, when the former took power 33 years after the latter's death, following the reign of three other Great Khans. Weatherford also mostly ignores developments in the other Khan lineages upon Kubalai taking the (disputed) title of Great Khan. He makes some ambitious and expansive claims, but doesn't provide compelling evidence. A few that caught my eyes are that Mongol culture was a foundational precursor to the European Renaissance or that the Nazi's blitzkrieg strategy was based on the study of Mongolian battle tactics. He could well be right, but I wasn't convinced of his conclusions on the basis of the evidence he presented.

As a biography, I didn't get much of a feel for Genghis Khan man outside of his tactical brilliance and shrewdness for exploiting public sentiment. I felt I had a much better sense of the character of Ogodei and Kubalai Khan than Genghis himself. Granted, much of that is probably due to lack of good contemporaneous primary sources due to historical reasons, and Weatherford seems to feel that the main source of truth is The Secret History of the Mongols, a history written either late in Temujin's life or shortly after his death. But much of the Secret History seems like after the fact mythmaking, such as when it claims that Temujin was born with a blood clot in his fist, portending great leadership. Broadly there's a lot of projection and conjecture about how he must have felt and thought. For example Weatherford sometimes posits that perhaps Khan was just trying to protect his family, his tribe, and his way of life, rather than conquer the known world. I don't know. Given the lack of good primary sources, I'd rather he leaned more on secondary sources with the necessary qualifications, or kept it more concise and stuck to the facts. As is, the biographical portions awkwardly straddles the line between idle conjecture and dry "and then this happened".

Finally as far as the broader Mongol empire is concerned, the focus is surprisingly narrow and cursory on the broader conquest. It has a pretty good discussion of broader strategy, tactics, and specific applications, but Weatherford mostly focuses on a couple campaigns (European campaigns of Ogodei Khan, Kubalai's campaigns into Sung China, and Genghis' campaigns in Mongolia, against the Jurched, and against the Khwarizm). Meanwhile he'll casually drop "And by this point the Mongols had dominion over Korea" without explaining how the Mongols adapted their steppe calvary tactics to the mountains and monsoons of Korea, while claiming the Mongols were stopped cold going out of their steppe comfort zone into the tropics of southern India or the forests of Western Europe. He sets up an epic conflict in Egypt an army of with former slav slaves, but kind of cursorily refers to it while suddenly jumping 20 years in to the future before jumping back. And as stated above, he has a pretty heavy focus on Kubalai, only briefly touching on the Ilkhanate in Persia and the Golden Horde in Eastern Europe.

In all, I enjoyed the book and I'm not swayed by other criticism I've seen about whitewashing the character of a despot. I appreciate Weatherford trying to bring more nuance to a much caricatured man and culture. But couldn't help but think that the book is less than the sum of its parts, and could have been much more.


Tags : Amazon.com: Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World (8580001057491): Jack Weatherford: Books,Jack Weatherford,Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World,Broadway Books,0609809644,Asia,Asia - General,Historical,World,Genghis Khan,Mongols - History,Mongols - Kings and rulers,Mongols.,Mongols;History.,Mongols;Kings and rulers;Biography.,BIOGRAPHY & AUTOBIOGRAPHY Historical,BIOGRAPHY AND AUTOBIOGRAPHY,Biography,Biography Autobiography,EAST ASIA - HISTORY,GENERAL,General Adult,HISTORY Asia General,HISTORY World,Historical - General,History,HistoryAsia - General,HistoryEurope - Medieval,HistoryWorld,History: World,Kings and rulers,Medieval,Mongols,Mongols - History,Mongols - Kings and rulers,Mongols.,Mongols;History.,Mongols;Kings and rulers;Biography.,Non-Fiction,United States,WORLD HISTORY,World,asia; ancient history; anthropology; chinese history; biography; china; genghis khan; europe; buddhism; politics; history; war; middle east; middle ages; world history; medieval history; military history; medieval; warrior; foreign relations; cyber monday deals; black friday; black friday deals; amazon black friday deals 2017; biographies of famous people; memoir; memoirs; autobiography; ghengis khan; napoleon bonaparte books; genghis khan and the making of the modern world; biographies; asian; historical books; history books,ghengis khan;cyber monday deals;black friday;black friday deals;amazon black friday deals 2017;biographies of famous people;memoir;biography;memoirs;asia;ancient history;anthropology;chinese history;china;genghis khan;europe;buddhism;politics;history;war;middle east;middle ages;world history;medieval history;military history;medieval;warrior;foreign relations;napoleon bonaparte books;genghis khan and the making of the modern world;autobiography;biographies;asian;historical books;history books,BIOGRAPHY & AUTOBIOGRAPHY Historical,HISTORY Asia General,HISTORY World,Historical - General,HistoryAsia - General,HistoryEurope - Medieval,Medieval,Biography Autobiography,Biography,Kings and rulers,Mongols,East Asia - History,World History,History,History: World

Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World Jack Weatherford Books Reviews

Weatherford exploded common beliefs of evil instilled in my education (two degrees) about Khan. Obviously researched beyond all other efforts by multiple historians, Weatherford's masterful writings about positive impact that Khan delivered to civilization fully deserves top prizes in both literature and interpretation of history. I was so impressed with the writing and findings that I then bought his book about the positive impact the natives of the Americas had on the world--also explosive. Where is the Nobel Committee? Pulitzer judges? Understanding readers?
Level of detail revealed by the author is amazing. It's almost too much in the sense that his insights are so wrapped in minute details that it easily loses the reader.

He also repeatedly provided too much descriptive episodes of torture that it was upsetting and repugnant. Was it necessary to describe what happened to Fatima or how the clerics of Europe wrote about the torture of Christian virgins post 1241? It seemed unnecessary though I suppose scholarly at some level appealing at the same time to The purient interests of the reader. For the same reason I won't watch beheadings of ISIS victims i felt compelled to skim over some of the gory details of torture.

I also was lost in the complex genealogy of Genghis Kahns complex lineages. It's hard to track and some charts would have been helpful.c

Finally , I think the book would have been greatly improved with pictures of the Mongolia Weatherford wrote. It would have given me a,sense of the land that the Kahn grew up in and conquered.
Wonderfully detailed yet reads like an adventure story. Genesis Khan was vilified down through history but he truly united peoples, leveled the playing field with Islamic nations, humbled the European forces sent out against him, and opened the world in many ways. His story is a marvelous journey through time and should be read with a total concept of history and how events can be influenced by great leaders. A great book.
Very interesting and to me quite unknown history of Genghis and
Kubilai Khan. The connection between Kubilai Khan and the Forbidden city as well as the connection between the Mongols and the Indian Moghuls were such a surprise.
The origins of certain terms like 'horde' or 'hurray' were so interesting!
The progressiveness of some of the Mongol ideas in the 13 th century were totally unexpexted.
An amazing experience and a very well written history.
A well written and well read (in terms of the audio version) book on the Mongol Empire romthe time of Genghis Khan through the reign of Kubulai Khan. This book gives great detail into the early life of Tenmugen and the struggles and realities of living during a tumultuous period. The book isnt without its faults however, the author seems to go to great lengths to portray Genghis and the Mongols as bringers of peace and welfare. At one point he even goes so far as to suggest that a four year gap in the documentation of public executions must suggest that the Mongols did not execute. It seems like a rash assumption considering that the amount of death that followed the Mongol hoard would make Hitler jealous. All together it is an interesting read but please be aware that it comes through a very pro Mongol lens.
Totally changed my perception of geopolitics-really! This book, thoroughly researched, blasts the myths surrounding Ghenghis Khan and demonstrates his wisdom and courage as a leader. Perhaps more importantly, it contributes invaluable knowledge about the role of the Mongols in reshaping the world to forge trade routes, developing societies where many religions coexisted peacefully and exploding many of our prior myths about the savagery of the Mongol Horde. One of the most fascinating books on history I have read.
I was very excited for this book and the ambitiousness of its scope, but found myself underwhelmed. It's entertaining and educational, I found myself wanting more in multiple respects. More details, more evidence, more expansive coverage.

The book can't quite seem to decide what it wants to be. Is it a thesis of how the Mongol empire provided foundational technologies and practices of the modern age? Is it a biography of Genghis Khan? Is it a history of the Mongol empire? It turns out to be a haphazard mix of all three, with major shortcomings on all fronts.

As a broader anthropological thesis about the impact of Genghis Khan, Weatherford makes a very compelling case that the Mongol empire contained some then-innovative ASPECTS of modern ideals (e.g. religious tolerance, meritocracy, globalization of commerce, public schooling, paper currency, among others). He convincingly argues that the Mongols spread good ideas from one region of the empire to another, and combined those ideas in novel ways. He doesn't do a very good job of arguing that these innovations formed the basis of the modernity, spread into the broader world, and continued into today. Much of his focus is also on developments after the death of Genghis, particularly on Kubalai. While this makes sense from a historical narrative perspective, it's harder to tie the achievements of Kubalai back to Genghis, when the former took power 33 years after the latter's death, following the reign of three other Great Khans. Weatherford also mostly ignores developments in the other Khan lineages upon Kubalai taking the (disputed) title of Great Khan. He makes some ambitious and expansive claims, but doesn't provide compelling evidence. A few that caught my eyes are that Mongol culture was a foundational precursor to the European Renaissance or that the Nazi's blitzkrieg strategy was based on the study of Mongolian battle tactics. He could well be right, but I wasn't convinced of his conclusions on the basis of the evidence he presented.

As a biography, I didn't get much of a feel for Genghis Khan man outside of his tactical brilliance and shrewdness for exploiting public sentiment. I felt I had a much better sense of the character of Ogodei and Kubalai Khan than Genghis himself. Granted, much of that is probably due to lack of good contemporaneous primary sources due to historical reasons, and Weatherford seems to feel that the main source of truth is The Secret History of the Mongols, a history written either late in Temujin's life or shortly after his death. But much of the Secret History seems like after the fact mythmaking, such as when it claims that Temujin was born with a blood clot in his fist, portending great leadership. Broadly there's a lot of projection and conjecture about how he must have felt and thought. For example Weatherford sometimes posits that perhaps Khan was just trying to protect his family, his tribe, and his way of life, rather than conquer the known world. I don't know. Given the lack of good primary sources, I'd rather he leaned more on secondary sources with the necessary qualifications, or kept it more concise and stuck to the facts. As is, the biographical portions awkwardly straddles the line between idle conjecture and dry "and then this happened".

Finally as far as the broader Mongol empire is concerned, the focus is surprisingly narrow and cursory on the broader conquest. It has a pretty good discussion of broader strategy, tactics, and specific applications, but Weatherford mostly focuses on a couple campaigns (European campaigns of Ogodei Khan, Kubalai's campaigns into Sung China, and Genghis' campaigns in Mongolia, against the Jurched, and against the Khwarizm). Meanwhile he'll casually drop "And by this point the Mongols had dominion over Korea" without explaining how the Mongols adapted their steppe calvary tactics to the mountains and monsoons of Korea, while claiming the Mongols were stopped cold going out of their steppe comfort zone into the tropics of southern India or the forests of Western Europe. He sets up an epic conflict in Egypt an army of with former slav slaves, but kind of cursorily refers to it while suddenly jumping 20 years in to the future before jumping back. And as stated above, he has a pretty heavy focus on Kubalai, only briefly touching on the Ilkhanate in Persia and the Golden Horde in Eastern Europe.

In all, I enjoyed the book and I'm not swayed by other criticism I've seen about whitewashing the character of a despot. I appreciate Weatherford trying to bring more nuance to a much caricatured man and culture. But couldn't help but think that the book is less than the sum of its parts, and could have been much more.